Based on the UK, but interested in feminism globally.

Any questions?
Ask a feminist

Click to submit

Factumbls (inc. references) are imported from @feministfacts

"gender"
Thursday, March 15, 2012
"A popular exercise among High School creative writing teachers in America is to ask students to imagine they have been transformed, for a day, into someone of the opposite sex, and describe what that day might be like. The results, apparently, are uncannily uniform. The girls all write long and detailed essays that clearly show they have spent a great deal of time thinking about the subject. Half of the boys usually refuse to write the essay entirely. Those who do make it clear they have not the slightest conception what being a teenage girl might be like, and deeply resent having to think about it."

David Graeber, “Beyond Power/Knowledge: An Exploration of Power, Ignorance and Stupidity” (pdf)

He also says much the same thing in “Revolutions in Reverse,” an essay included in the book Revolutions in Reverse (which can be read in Scribd at the link). I’d been meaning to post a quote from the second source for a while, thanks to Aaron Brady for the actual excerpt above. That last link is a good essay on the recent Rush Limbaugh BS and how patriarchy works and how male privilege is defended by having men like Limbaugh around to keep women’s opinions out of the allowed discourse on the subject. To keep high school boys forever unable to write essays that could relate to the issue of needing hormonal birth control to control ovarian cysts.

(via youthisastateofmind)

We talked about this a lot this year in English. Girls are taught from a young age that we have to connect to what we read, so when we do excercises in class, everyone talks about how they connect to Huck Finn, or to Jay Gatsby, or to Julius Caesar. We connect to all the characters because we have to, because if we don’t then we won’t survive through the years of school.

Boys don’t deal with this. Practically every book or story they encounter from the time they begin school is full of male characters and written by men. So when confronted with female characters of female authors, they don’t know what to do. They feel as if they can’t connect with these characters because of the gender boundaries. As one woman in my class pointed out, “girls have to connect to male characters, but boys don’t have to connect to female characters.” By the time they’re my age, it’s not even intentional: many honestly think that they won’t understand a female character because they have no shared experiences whatsoever.

(via animehrmine)

Sunday, October 30, 2011
janedoe225:

 Where Are the Women at Occupy Wall Street? Everywhere—and They’re Not Going Away 
The dozen women I spoke to for this story—most of them  queer-identified and/or women of color—have witnessed varying amounts of  offensive behavior, such as unwanted touching or use of casually  misogynist language, within the movement.And they also differ as to the  extent to which they think they can elbow the “isms” out of their  space. But for the most part they share a defiant hope; just maybe, they  say, for once, a mobilization for social change can get it right:  maintain a broad base of support, connect the dots between different  kinds of injustice and achieve staying power. Their fervent wish is that  the movement’s careful attention to inclusive structure, including  “safe space” caucuses and working groups and a commitment to  anti-oppression training, means not that misogyny will vanish altogether  but rather that diverse voices will remain a core part of the movement.

janedoe225:

Where Are the Women at Occupy Wall Street? Everywhere—and They’re Not Going Away

The dozen women I spoke to for this story—most of them queer-identified and/or women of color—have witnessed varying amounts of offensive behavior, such as unwanted touching or use of casually misogynist language, within the movement.And they also differ as to the extent to which they think they can elbow the “isms” out of their space. But for the most part they share a defiant hope; just maybe, they say, for once, a mobilization for social change can get it right: maintain a broad base of support, connect the dots between different kinds of injustice and achieve staying power. Their fervent wish is that the movement’s careful attention to inclusive structure, including “safe space” caucuses and working groups and a commitment to anti-oppression training, means not that misogyny will vanish altogether but rather that diverse voices will remain a core part of the movement.

Thursday, October 20, 2011
Six Myths About Sex And Gender, Busted

You know how men want sex all the time whereas women just want diamonds and babies? It turns out that if you look closely at the science behind these claims, a lot of gender differences disappear. A new review of existing research by psychologists at the University of Michigan deconstructs six common Mars/Venus claims.

(Source: boomvagynamite)

Monday, September 12, 2011
fixebowl:

Chart of the Day: Breakdown of hours worked per week by gender and income level
(from MJ)

fixebowl:

Chart of the Day: Breakdown of hours worked per week by gender and income level

(from MJ)

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

(Source: straightfromscarbz)

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

boomvagynamite:

We gotta demand pay that reflects the job you do not whether you got a dick or not.”

Saturday, August 6, 2011
"When a child clings on to a highly desirable toy and claims that his companion ‘doesn’t want to play with it’, I have found that it is wise to be suspicious."
Cordelia Fine, ‘Gender Equality 2.0?’ in Delusions of Gender: The Real Science Behind Sex Differences  (via boomvagynamite)
Friday, August 5, 2011
Do Women need more degrees than Men?

feistyfeminist:

feministdykeslut:

The study’s other main finding is that a woman generally needs more degrees than a man in order to earn the same amount of money. For example, the average woman must obtain a Ph.D in order to keep pace with the average bachelor’s degree-holding man.

“The women’s story is grand and dismal,” concluded Carnevale. After scanning all 171 majors included in the study, he found not one major where women consistently out-earn men.

The report also found similar gaps by ethnicity and race. For instance, African Americans and Latinos earn less money than their white peers — even those whites with less education. Further, the average African American or Latino with a master’s degree doesn’t exceed the lifetime earnings of white bachelor’s degree holder. Finally, the report concluded that Asian Americans with graduate degrees earn more than all other races, including whites.

Wednesday, June 29, 2011
Thursday, February 24, 2011
Fliptripper (Multiply): The Mosuo People of China

boomvagynamite:

A recent story on the Discovery Channel show Hour Asia featured an unusual indigenous tribe of the Yunnan province of China, the Mosuo people. Two things make this tribe particularly interesting: First, in this tribe women do all the work - including physical labor. Men do little or nothing all day. Second, there are no marriages in this tribe. Consequently, they have no concept of “husband” or “father.”


The Lugu Lake is home to the Mosuo people, one of China’s 56 ethnic groups. Hidden from the rest of China behind the Xiaoliang mountains, the Mosuo culture has evolved with little influence from its neighbors. Unlike the rest of China, where the one-child policy created nuclear families and a clear preference for male children, the Mosuo people live in extended families and prefer female children.


Sexual freedom
The most publicized aspect of the Mosuo culture however, is their sexual freedom - men and women can have as many lovers as they wish without legal restraints. Recently, Lugu Lake has become a popular tourist spot, particularly for men enticed by the fantasy of “free love.”

The institution of marriage as we know it does not exist in the Mosuo culture. Instead, they practice “walking marriages,” where the man would visit the woman at night, and go home to his mother’s house in the morning. They can begin or end their relationship at any time, and are allowed as many lovers as they wish. There is no formality in these relationships and lovers never share common property, as all property is inherited by women. Children borne from such unions are raised by the mother’s family, and live their entire lives in their mother’s home. There are no social or economic responsibilities expected from the father.

The Mosuo people find little reason to mix matters of survival and matters of the heart. For them, control over matters of property and the raising of children should remain in the hands of blood relatives, whose loyalty to the family is unquestionable. Thus, relationships are pursued out of love, without issues of money or property to complicate it. Contented couples stay together, and unhappy couples can go their separate ways. The absence of paternal relations has done away with domestic conflicts with in-laws, a common source of conflict in our society.

Mosuo families are organized in maternal clans, with several generations living under one roof. The extended family is led by the matriarch, and leadership of the household is passed on to the most intelligent daughter.


Economic decisions
The matriarch makes all the economic decisions, dividing the work and the income of the household among its members. The curious thing about the division of labor, however, is that women do almost all the work, both productive (farming/fishing) and domestic work. Men work only twice a year, during extreme labor shortages.

What is the quality of life of the Mosuo men? For many men in our society, a “walking marriage” is perhaps a dream come true. One anonymous male posted a message in the internet saying that all his friends want to join the Mosuo tribe when they found out that men can have multiple lovers with no social or economic responsibilities. But are Mosuo men really better off?

Following standard consumption theory, the Mosuo men must have very high levels of satisfaction or utility considering the amount of leisure they enjoy. On the other hand, if we define well-being in terms of human functioning, as in Amartya Sen’s definition of the ability “to do” and “to be,” one might conclude that Mosuo men are clearly at a disadvantage, since they have little control over their lives.


Gender bias
Feminist economists have argued that the gender bias we observe in our societies today reflects the power structure between men and women. Perhaps the arguments put forward by feminist economists are better appreciated when the tables are turned. In the Mosuo tribe, it is obvious that because women have control over resources, they can decide who gets what and enjoy a much higher social status than men.

In fact, because there is little conflict and therefore little bargaining in Mosuo households, it exemplifies Gary Becker’s “altruistic” family model. In Becker’s model, an altruistic dictator (the matriarch), who “cares” for the welfare of all the members of her family, optimally allocates household resources among its members.

However, we must clarify that the matriarch does not dictate because she is the most altruistic or caring member of the family. She dictates because she has the power to do so.

The Mosuo tribe is a clear example of how gender roles are in fact “socially ascribed.” Women’s biological function of childbearing has been traditionally used as an argument for the “natural” assignment of household responsibilities to women. Feminist economists argue, however, that only childbearing is biologically restricted to women, while childrearing and household work is
socially determined.


Child rearing
In the Mosuo society, men participate in childrearing as uncles and brothers, but do little else. Surely, the assignment of productive work to women, including physical labor, has less to do with biological functions, and more to do with social structure.

One wonders how it is that the dominated gender, in this case the men, are not exploited or overworked. It is almost as if the men are being “compensated” for their disempowerment, and this benevolent treatment of men is probably what keeps them from overthrowing the matriarch.

In addition, this structure conditions men to depend completely on women in all aspects of survival. There is simply no incentive for the men to challenge their existing way of life.

This bears some similarities in the male-dominated households many of us are more familiar with. When women are less educated, and have less opportunities to financially support themselves and their children, they are entirely dependent on their husbands for survival. Unlike the benevolent treatment of men in the Mosuo tribe, however, these women work long hours and take on great responsibilities - often without recognition that what they do is “real work.”

Although this breeds discontent, the lack of alternatives for these women and the threat of violence, allow this power structure to thrive.


Alternative structure
More than just a feminist fantasy, the survival of a culture with a seemingly impossible setup teaches us an important lesson: that an alternative social structure can exist. A world where no man rules, no man makes important decisions, no man inherits property, and no man works, is not just a myth.

Contrary to fears raised by those who hesitate to empower women, society need not fall apart when women have control. In fact, the female-dominated society of Mosuo exists in love and harmony - a stark contrast to male-dominated societies that exist in violence and hate. The Mosuo people have successfully averted many social problems. As a result, their language has no words for war, murder or rape.

Although the Mosuo experience is certainly far from the ideal of gender equality, it shows that there is nothing natural or inevitable about gender biases. A bias for one or the other is influenced by power relations and social roles, not biology. If we truly believe that every individual - regardless of race, ethnicity or gender - is entitled to the same privileges and benefits development has to offer, we must seek to transform the very structures that perpetuate and reinforce inequalities.

The good news is that gender relations have been changing with the times. Gone were the days when educating girls was believed to be a waste, since they will only marry and become housewives.

Gone were the days when it was unthinkable for a woman to vote. By recognizing that social roles can change, given the proper incentives, we have overcome the first hurdle in the struggle for gender equality.

(Emphasis mine.)

Powered by Tumblr. Lightie Futurum designed by Pavia Graphics.